![]() Use FastRawViewer - a great time-saver and an ideal RAW workflow helper.įastRawViewer opens RAW files extremely quickly and renders them on-the-fly, instead of just displaying embedded JPEGs. Is your RAW converter slow while building 1:1 previews or culling RAW files? Fastrawviewer 1.3.2.937 series series#ĭigger also looks very good but might be too much of a technical distraction.Īny advice on how best to use FRV to select the "best" from a series of bracketed exposures? From advice in FRV vids and tuts I guess I look for an exposure with not more than 0,3 EV per channel (is this the correct value?) of over-exposure in important areas.The Only Real WYSIWYG Raw Viewer The Essential Workflow Tool for Every RAW Shooter Then look at these candidates and pick the image with the widest exposure range that does not clip the shadows (In my case for Pany Lumix FZ-1000 the dynamic range is about 10 EV). I was also just looking into FastRawViewer for myself, and happened across some well-thought-out videos on their site. One of them is a culling workflow video which really goes into detail of determining which bracketed shot is "best", specifically exposing to the right on all three raw channels (or rather, the right-most RAW channel) to avoid clipping of important (as opposed to specular) highlights, and providing the most low-end room in the shadows to minimize noise. The videos are on YouTube, linked from their site at. The culling workflow one is at the bottom. You might also be interested in "What is FastRawViewer? Part 2" which gives a good example of why using the Raw histogram is critical to culling rather than the JPEG or in-camera histograms. I just went through a softball tournament shoot, where I'm not looking at bracketed exposures but rather looking for proper focus, capturing the action, faces, etc. I don't think FRV is a huge advantage there compared to a JPEG-based viewer (ie, one which just displays the embedded JPEG versions and histograms etc), but I also periodically do more landscape/architecture shots which will really benefit from the raw histogram feature. I'm now a paying customer at $20 (full regular price), it's a steal. I've used it for several years and find it very useful, primarily as a pre-editor. Photoshop has been a lead element for a couple of decades. My most recent is CS6, the last to install by download or disk. I've continued to use Photoshop and Lightroom in the last downloaded version and whatever updates come. The cameras I've accumulated in the last few years generate RAW that CS6 won't handle with the exception of the Leica DNG files.I could convert, but am not really inclined to do that. My primary systems are Canon 5D Mk4, an 80D and a pair of Sony mirrorless, a NEX 7 and an A7R. ![]() I continue to use CS6 not just for itself, but as a front-end for a growing number of filter packages. Topaz plugins and Topaz studio, serve fine either independently or through CS6 with recent RAW. I'm a prolific shooter and have years of backlog that haven't been gone through properly, i.e. And there are scads of RAW I need to go through. For that, nothing really equals Fast Raw Viewer. I can scan through RAW,JPG, JPF or anything else and dump those that don't make the cut in short order.įRV provides for single or batch handling, contrast adjustment, exposure adjustment, rotation, flips, sharpening, etc and links to external programs, e.g. Fastrawviewer 1.3.2.937 series free#Ĭurrently, FRV is developing a dual pixel program - it's a beta free download. I don't use it for cataloging, final processing, etc. ![]() It allows me to go through material from several years back. If you don't have a lot of raw to process, it's probably not worth the money. It could be a valuable tool to professionals. I've been using FRV for a while, bracketing my images and choosing the exposure with minimun per channel clipping and greatest dynamic range. Results have been good, but I sometimes wonder if its worth the extra effort. Could I have done as well with carefully using my in-camera (jpeg) histogram and zebra display? Certainly that's the way many of the raw-shooters do it. I use FRV for culling not only among brackets, but overall. Saves me time, as I don't have to import as many into Lr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |